top of page
Mondrala
The Reading Experience

 

An occasional blog on beautiful and wise books,  book writing,

book translation, and the reading experience.



(p. 132)


Having set foot in the sacred land of Greece, the emperor devoted himself exclusively to artistic pursuits. Various programs took place in different towns: singing competitions, chariot races, poetry recitations, and theatrical performances. And invariably, the world’s best singer, its most excellent musician, and its most brilliant actor—Nero—performed in them all. He received frenetic applause, aroused universal enthusiasm, and won first prizes, wreaths, and memorial statuary. It was, therefore, hardly surprising that overwork and excess of impressions prevented him from dealing with trivial matters like current politics. Nothing out of the ordinary was happening anyway.


But then, this blessed living for art alone was suddenly disturbed by news from Judea and, in particular, by the news of the defeat of Cestius Gallus. Of course, it was clearly not a major disaster by any means. The whole thing was a rebellion of a small people, and while, yes, it had inflicted some casualties on the Roman corps, none of it was cause for alarm. The forces led by Cestius were only part of the army stationed in Syria, and other legions could easily be moved to the Palestinian theater if necessary. Yet, it was unwise to underestimate the importance of the uprising. Rome had to suppress it as soon as possible lest it become a contagious example to other subjugated peoples.


The emperor and his advisers judged the situation well, stating publicly that the defeat in Judea was brought about, above all, by the incompetence of the commander. It, therefore, behooved the emperor to send a new general, an energetic and experienced man. We do not know what candidates were considered, but the final result is known. And we can guess why the choice fell on this particular senator and not any other.

The newly designated commander-in-chief was Flavius Vespasian.


Of course, Vespasian had proven himself as an effective general in Germany and Britain and possibly as a capable administrator in Africa. However, there was no shortage of people with similar or even better qualifications in the Senate, so there had to have been other considerations. The decisive factor seems to have been that Vespasian did not belong to any of the great aristocratic families and was not aligned with any of them: he had no Senators among his ancestors. And all the conspiracies uncovered in recent years, both real and imagined, had all involved members of old and distinguished families. Nero and his advisers were understandably suspicious of the people of that class. They certainly would not have entrusted a mighty army to any aristocrat—and to put down the uprising in Judea would require a large army comprised of several legions.

It is possible that Vespasian’s candidacy was helped, somewhat paradoxically, by a small and amusing event, but one imbued with very special meaning in the eyes of Nero. It had recently been reported to the emperor that Vespasian showed little enthusiasm during the emperor’s artistic performances; indeed, that he showed no interest in them at all. To speak the brutal truth—that they made him fall asleep. As soon as this matter was reported, the Senator was punished with displeasure. He was ordered to leave the imperial entourage and go to one of the small Greek towns for a while. It is easy to imagine the anxiety in which he lived there, deeply convinced that his career, and perhaps his life, had already come to an end. When he sought help from one of the emperor’s freedmen, he heard a formerly unimaginable answer:


“Get lost!”


Vespasian could only console himself with the fact that his fortune was rather small and that he was in debt, for in recent years, the emperor had tended to send very rich people to the other world.


It is very likely that during the deliberations within the imperial entourage, someone recommended his candidacy half-jokingly and half-seriously, saying:


“Ah, Vespasian should be sent to war! He is a simpleton, he has no idea about art, here he’s only a pain and makes himself ridiculous. There, in the military camp, he will be at home. Let him go and fight and leave us here to delight in your art, Caesar!”


And someone else added:


“He’s well over fifty, but he’s still robust and healthy.”


And yet someone else chimed in:


“He’s just a simple peasant. Short, stocky, strong in arms and legs. Square big head and tiny eyes. He will do well.”


And then someone else:


“Though he certainly will feel lonely without his Caenis!”


And thus, the combination of many factors, both weighty and ridiculous, decided the future of both Rome and Jerusalem.

 
 
 

Updated: Aug 18, 2023



In the year 1670, at the height of glory of Louis XIV, and before rebellions and unlucky foreign wars dimmed somewhat the brilliance of the Sun-King, his cousin and sister-in-law, Henriette d'Angleterre, daughter of the unlucky Charles I of England, wife of Phillip d’Orleans, staged a bloodless game: a head-to-head duel between two court dramatists, the aging Pierre Corneille (1606-1684) and the up-and-coming Jean Racine (1639-1699), both of whom were commissioned to produce a play on the subject of Berenice, Queen of the Jews.


Performed a week apart at the end of November 1670, the two plays caused a furor, a loud war of words and pamphlets between two cultural (and, therefore, as always in France, political) factions—the supporters of one or the other. It was a war conclusively won by the new man. Broken by his defeat, Corneille never wrote another play. For Racine, this victory marked his rise to power. In 1672 he was elevated to a seat in the Academie and went on to compose, in short order, his greatest plays: Bajazet (1672), Mithridate (1673), Iphigénie (1674) and Phèdre (1677).

The French ruckus caused a veritable cultural tsunami across the landscape of European courts, all of which rushed to stage their own versions of the story, whether in dramatic, or poetic, or operatic, or graphic form. As a result, the amount of “Titus and Berenice” output deposited in the deep layers of European culture is staggering; Racine’s play remains on the playbill in France until this day. As a result, most Europeans have heard of Titus and Berenice: the title rings a bell even if most today cannot say which church is tolling.




 
 
 

Updated: Aug 5, 2023



Mount up, Madonnas, Madonnas,

Your teams-of-six, of six!

Your steeds hang hooves in the air

They wait, adozing, they wait!

Each chariot is painted tri-color,

Each team is of three coats:

The vault, the oak, the carrot!


Then stir the divine Madonnas,

the hundred horses start!

They spin like a vinyl record

The record that goes this:


Flash by the thoroughbreads!

The saddle lambrekins

The blazing colors of chariots

Flowery, decorative

In each, face-to-face,

Madonna and Madonna,

In her ageless pose remains

bent backwards bent backwards

--white horses

--chariot!

--black horses

--chariot!

--bay horses

--chariot!

Magnificat!


And they

In Leonardo's frowns

In the twists of Raphael

In rounded flames, in cages of ropes,

In the suburbs, on a Sunday.

Madonna and Madonna

Who knows which one's asleep

And which one is inspired

--a team-of-six

--and two!

--a team-of-six

--and two!

--a team-of-six

--the two!

What madness!


And then the carousel slows

Repeats the fading chorus

the fading cho-

Rapha

el Mado

nnas

donnas

sub

urban

sub


----


Mount up

the teams-of-six!


Miron Białoszewski, 1956


The poem is said to have been inspired by a carousel in a suburban fairground but combines elements of sacrum and profanum. The art song featured at the top emphasizes the former.







 
 
 

©2021 by Mondrala Press

bottom of page